Money Laundering Defense Attorney

Federal Money Laundering Defense Attorney

Dan Eckhart is a federal money laundering defense attorney and criminal defense lawyer based in Orlando, Florida, representing individuals, executives, and business owners facing money laundering charges across the United States. Federal money laundering cases run on multiple tracks simultaneously, and charges, forfeitures, and financial restrictions can each begin before an indictment is filed.

Understanding Money Laundering: What Federal Charges Actually Mean

Federal money laundering is not a single offense. Two primary statutes define it, and neither requires the government to separately charge the underlying crime that generated the funds.

18 U.S.C. § 1956 — Laundering of Monetary Instruments

The core federal statute. Covers financial transactions involving proceeds of specified unlawful activity (SUA) when the defendant acted with intent to conceal the source of those proceeds or to promote further criminal activity. The government does not need to prove the defendant committed the underlying offense, only that the funds came from one.

18 U.S.C. § 1957 — Engaging in Monetary Transactions in Criminally Derived Property

Covers transactions over $10,000 involving property derived from a felony. Unlike § 1956, it does not require proof of concealment intent. It is frequently charged alongside § 1956 to increase total count exposure.

Money Laundering Laws: What "Specified Unlawful Activity" Means

Prosecutors must connect the alleged transactions to a predicate offense: drug trafficking, healthcare fraud, bank fraud, bribery, tax evasion, or any of dozens of designated violations under federal law. The predicate offense does not need to be separately charged or proven in the same case. Money laundering charges stand independently of what ultimately happens to the underlying offense.

How Money Laundering Gets Added to Other Federal Cases

Federal prosecutors routinely stack money laundering counts on top of drug trafficking charges, fraud cases, and bribery investigations to multiply sentencing exposure, strengthen forfeiture claims, and gain leverage in plea negotiations. The government assembles these cases from bank records, wire transfers, structured deposits, shell company filings, real estate closings, and cryptocurrency blockchain analysis. Many times there is an insider cooperating with the government.

Stacking in Drug Trafficking Cases

When drug proceeds are deposited, transferred, or spent, laundering counts convert that financial conduct into independent criminal exposure. The drug quantity drives one portion of the sentencing calculation; the value of the alleged laundered funds can drive another.

Stacking in White-Collar Cases

In healthcare fraud, bank fraud, and related cases, laundering counts are added when prosecutors can show that proceeds moved through transactions designed to conceal their origin or continue the scheme. Business accounts, investment accounts, and real estate transactions are the most common vehicles.

Financial Structuring: A Separate Federal Charge

Federal structuring under 31 U.S.C. § 5324 prohibits breaking up transactions to avoid the Bank Secrecy Act's $10,000 reporting threshold. Structuring does not require criminally derived funds: a business owner can face structuring charges, and sometimes also be charged with money laundering, even when all of the money involved is legitimate. Intent to avoid reporting is the central contested element.

Common scenarios:

• Cash-intensive businesses making regular deposits just under $10,000
• Multiple accounts used to divide single cash receipts
• Deposits timed to avoid triggering currency transaction reports (CTRs)
• Transactions restructured after a bank inquiry
• Third parties instructed to deposit funds below reporting thresholds

Structuring charges often appear in a superseding indictment after the government has traced how cash was handled. Defense centers on what the client actually knew about reporting requirements and whether the transaction pattern had a legitimate explanation.

Federal Money Laundering Penalties, Forfeiture, and Sentencing Exposure

A conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 1956 carries a statutory maximum of 20 years per count, with fines that can reach twice the amount of money involved. Beyond the sentence, federal money laundering cases carry three categories of risk that move on different timelines.

Custody Risk

Federal detention is possible once charges are filed. How bail is argued at the first appearance, and what the judge is told about the defendant's financial picture, can determine whether a client remains free during the case.

Financial Risk

The government can seek pre-indictment restraining orders under 21 U.S.C. § 853(e), administratively seize accounts, and file civil forfeiture complaints before trial. Commonly targeted assets include bank accounts, real estate, vehicles, retirement and investment accounts, cryptocurrency holdings, business interests, and life insurance with cash value. Substitute asset provisions can reach clean assets when alleged proceeds are no longer available.

Charging Escalation Risk

A money laundering investigation can expand to include conspiracy, structuring, false statements, and obstruction, often triggered not by the original conduct but by how the target responds once under investigation.

Forfeiture Deadlines and Remedies

The Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act (CAFRA) imposes strict deadlines on challenging federal forfeitures. Those deadlines begin at seizure, not indictment, and missing them forfeits rights that cannot be recovered regardless of the criminal outcome. When accounts are frozen, available responses include negotiating release of funds for payroll and business expenses, filing a hardship motion under Monsanto and related authority to access funds for legal fees and living costs, challenging the seizure on probable cause grounds, and identifying unencumbered assets to sustain operations.

For a full explanation of the forfeiture defense process, see the dedicated Asset Forfeiture Defense page.

You don't need to wait for an indictment.

Grand jury subpoenas, CAFRA forfeiture deadlines, and pre-indictment restraining orders impose timelines that begin at the moment of government action.
Schedule a Consultation  Call Dan Eckhart Directly 

Defending Against Money Laundering Charges

The defense approach at Dan Eckhart Law is built on government-side experience. Eckhart is a former federal prosecutor, former federal agent, former lead forfeiture prosecutor, and former bank general counsel and head of corporate security, with approximately 23 years of federal government service. Having built federal financial crime cases from the inside, he understands how money laundering cases are constructed, where they are vulnerable, and how to position clients before prosecutors commit to a public theory.

Early case evaluation focuses on four questions: What does the government's case look like based on subpoenas served, records requested, and interviews conducted? What does the client have that the government does not? Are there cooperating witnesses, and where are their credibility vulnerabilities? And what does the complex financial evidence actually show on careful review?

Eckhart has appeared in nine federal districts outside Florida and represented the operator of what is described as the second-largest dark web marketplace in the world, as well as defendants in complex financial crime cases involving intelligence agency participation. Over 900 federal court docketing entries are documented across his career. The practice maintains approximately 20 active cases at any given time by design.

~23 years Federal government service
~900+ Federal court docketing entries
~20 Active cases at any given time

Challenging the Knowledge Element

The federal statutes require the government to prove the defendant knew the funds came from unlawful activity, and many cases fail on this element. Defense is built from contemporaneous evidence: what the client was told at the time, what professional advisors said, and what a reasonable person in that position would have understood.

Attacking the Predicate Offense Connection

If the government's financial narrative has gaps, if the underlying offense is not proven, or if the client's connection to it is not clearly established, the laundering theory weakens. Commingling cases often turn on accounting, third-party cases on knowledge, and cryptocurrency cases on attribution.

Identifying and Challenging Cooperating Witnesses

Federal financial cases frequently involve insiders providing information in exchange for reduced charges. Eckhart's prosecutorial background includes conducting proffer sessions and developing cooperating witnesses, experience that directly informs how he evaluates the government's witness strategy from the defense side.

Coordinating Criminal and Forfeiture Defense

Statements made in a civil forfeiture proceeding can be used in the parallel criminal case, and silence in forfeiture proceedings can result in loss of assets by default. Eckhart's background as a lead forfeiture prosecutor means he understands how the government uses both tracks simultaneously, which is why handling them together is a core element of the defense approach.

Managing Multi-Agency Investigations

Federal financial cases routinely involve multiple agencies: FBI, IRS Criminal Investigation, DEA, Homeland Security Investigations, and FinCEN, sometimes alongside civil regulators including the SEC, OCC, and state banking authorities. Identifying which agency drives the case and how responses to one demand might affect another proceeding is part of early case assessment.

What the First 72 Hours Look Like

When retained in a money laundering matter, the immediate focus is stabilization and assessment. The goal is to stop any avoidable damage, understand the government's current posture, and build the foundation for a viable defense strategy.

1. Detailed intake to understand the facts, the government's posture, and any immediate deadlines
2. Identification and preservation of relevant documents, communications, and financial records
3. Communication discipline instruction for the client and anyone close to them
4. Assessment of pending deadlines: CAFRA claim dates, subpoena return dates, scheduled interviews
5. Determination of whether and how to contact the assigned prosecutor or federal agents
6. Secure document intake for large volumes of financial records

Once retained, discovery is shared through a secure platform as received. Case files are reviewed multiple times, and all communication goes directly to Dan Eckhart.

Professional Memberships

Dan Eckhart is a member of the Federal Bar Association, National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, Florida Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, and the Central District of Florida Bar Association.

Federal Money Laundering Defense Across the United States

Dan Eckhart accepts federal money laundering cases nationwide. Intake, strategy, document review, and motion practice are handled remotely; Eckhart travels personally for hearings, detention arguments, negotiations, and trial. Travel costs for matters outside Central Florida are discussed and billed to the client before engagement.

He is admitted to federal courts across the United States and has appeared in the Southern District of Georgia, Northern District of Illinois, District of the Virgin Islands, Southern District of Texas, District of Columbia, District of Maryland, Southern District of Iowa, and the Eastern and Western Districts of Michigan, among others.

Florida Money Laundering Cases: Southern, Middle, and Northern Districts

Florida money laundering prosecutions are active across all three federal districts. The Southern District, covering Miami and surrounding areas, generates a high volume of federal financial crime indictments involving drug proceeds, international wire transfers, and large-scale fraud. Clients throughout South Florida seeking a money laundering attorney with federal prosecution experience can retain Eckhart directly.

In the Middle District, covering Orlando, Tampa, and Jacksonville, money laundering charges frequently arise from drug trafficking investigations and fraud cases along the I-4 corridor. Jacksonville money laundering cases and other Middle District matters are handled as part of the home district practice.

Why Geography Matters in Money Laundering Cases

Federal financial investigations span multiple districts because federal law enforcement agencies, including FBI, IRS-CI, DEA, and HSI, coordinate nationally. Identifying which district is driving the case and how venue affects strategy is part of effective representation from the start.

When to Contact a Defense Attorney

The most valuable window in a federal money laundering case is before anything irreversible has happened: before a first agent interview, before documents are produced, and before assets are frozen. Calling a lawyer does not escalate the situation. Not calling one often does.

Warning Signals That an Investigation May Be Underway

• Contact from federal law enforcement agencies: FBI, IRS Criminal Investigation, DEA, or Homeland Security Investigations
• A target letter or subject letter from a federal prosecutor's office
• A grand jury subpoena for financial records, personal or business
• Administrative seizure of a bank account or a notice of civil forfeiture
• A search warrant executed on a residence, business, or digital accounts and devices
• Notice from a financial institution that the government has served a subpoena on your accounts

CAFRA deadlines begin running at seizure, not indictment. Missing them forfeits rights that cannot be recovered. For more on pre-charge representation, see the Pre-Indictment Representation and Grand Jury Representation pages.

What Not to Do Before Speaking with Counsel

• Speak with federal agents, investigators, or prosecutors, even informally
• Move money, pay down balances, or transfer assets
• Delete emails, texts, files, or social media content
• Discuss the matter with employees, partners, accountants, bankers, or family members
• Sign any documents provided by the government
• Post anything related to the situation online

These actions can create new charges that did not previously exist: obstruction of justice, false statements under 18 U.S.C. § 1001, and additional money laundering counts. If agents have already made contact, document what was said and bring it to the first conversation with counsel.

Other Federal Financial Crime Charges

Money laundering charges frequently arise alongside other federal financial crime allegations. The pages below cover the most common charges that appear in the same indictment.

• Bank Fraud Defense
• Healthcare Fraud Defense
• Tax Fraud and Tax Evasion Defense
• Bankruptcy Fraud Defense
• Embezzlement Defense
• Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) Defense
• Asset Forfeiture Defense

Contact Dan Eckhart

Dan Eckhart Law was founded in 2017 and operates as a sole-practitioner law firm. There is no intake staff, no associates, and no intermediaries between the attorney and the client. Defense representation is handled directly and exclusively by Dan Eckhart.

The firm is accessible for urgent matters outside of regular business hours. Clients can call or text, identify themselves, and indicate the matter is urgent without providing details on an initial message.

Speak directly with a federal defense attorney who has handled these cases from both sides.

Schedule a Confidential Consultation  Call Dan Eckhart Directly